PieFed chez Marud
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
2 Comments
Comments from other communities
“Hey why is it taking you so long to review my PR?”
The AI found issues with its own code
The Bard in GreenMy absolute favorite thing about LLMs is how when they do that they explain the problem with “my code” to me.
watching it mansplain to itself why it was wrong is quite the amusement.
entropicdrift
tomiantDuh. AI’s trained on average human data, will produce average results. Want bliss? Train them on Architects.
deegeeseThe first one is against code too. No railing on the landing.
Electrical Depthit works though. you just need to turn off clipping.
Is this a real and stupid, non-functional set of stairs?
Or did someone create a cool/definitely impractical staircase where the second flight is on hinges and you lift it up to access the middle floor?
(Edit: I say this because the second flight looks like it’s made of wood and maybe not entirely fixed to the floor.)
Totally possible someone installed the form work for the stairs the wrong way and blocked off the lower ones.
Or they’ve mocked the building and instead of removing the old concrete stairs just walled them off like this.
Things like this are often a protest by the builders against the architect. They spot a problem with the design, try and tell them and get shouted at. They then build it to the design, knowing it’s stupid, so the architect has to swallow the cost of fixing it.
That’s nice.
Although I don’t understand how come an Architects drawing goes straight to a builder without a Civil Engineer in between.
LemmyoutofhereBoth stairs are perfectly usable on their own.
Second picture is indeed an accurate building of the left drawing. Both set of stairs are drawn in section, implying that they are on the same plane.
That is surely must an optical illusion right? I mean unless your are 2, who would invest time and effort to built a stair that closes in on itself?
the top stairs could have been added later, why demolish the old stairs if you don’t have to.